|
#2 (permalink) Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:50 am Conditionals |
|
|
Because this is the structure of the conditional III:
IF + condition + result
IF + past perfect + would have + past participle
Had is part of the past perfect construction in the condition clause. If you want to see the conditionals in practice please read this story by Alan Townend: ESL Lesson / Conditionals
TOEFL listening discussions: Why is the young woman unfamiliar with Q22? |
|
Torsten Learning Coach

Joined: 25 Sep 2003 Posts: 17788 Location: EU
|
|
#3 (permalink) Wed Feb 01, 2006 20:38 pm Conditional III |
|
|
I am from a lating country and I am learning English, but I think you guys made a mistake the conditional III for this would be:
If you had gotten that job, would you....?
instead of what you say
If you had got that job, would you....?
Olga Lucia Hopper |
|
Olga Lucia Hopper Guest
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Wed Feb 01, 2006 21:31 pm Had got/gotten |
|
|
Hi Olga Lucia Hopper,
It's not really a question of right or wrong. Both forms of the past participle are used. Gotten is used in North America.
Alan _________________ English as a Second Language You can read my ESL story Present Simple |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 17284 Location: UK
|
 |
#5 (permalink) Fri Feb 03, 2006 16:45 pm Had got/gotten |
|
|
Hi Alan:
I am confused, based on your answer, It's right if I say (in UK) I had forgot .... ?? Olga Lucia Hopper |
|
Guest
|
 |
#6 (permalink) Fri Feb 03, 2006 16:51 pm Forgot |
|
|
Hi,
That's not what i said. I was talking about get not forget.
Alan _________________ English as a Foreign Language You can read my EFL story Progressive Forms |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 17284 Location: UK
|
 |
#7 (permalink) Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:43 am Conditional III |
|
|
. However, forgot is indeed also an acceptable past participle, Olga-- chiefly US, as the Oxford says. . _________________ Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's |
|
Mister Micawber Language Coach
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 13018
|
 |
#8 (permalink) Sat Oct 25, 2008 13:49 pm Explanation of the Conditional III |
|
|
If you had got that job, would you have been able to move to a new house? had got is a Past Perfect from the verb: get, right? get changes to got? |
|
Saneta I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 11 Sep 2008 Posts: 1583
|
 |
#9 (permalink) Sat Oct 25, 2008 14:00 pm Explanation of the Conditional III |
|
|
. That's right. . _________________ Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's |
|
Mister Micawber Language Coach
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 13018
|
 |
#10 (permalink) Sun Jan 04, 2009 17:09 pm Had got? |
|
|
Hi every body!!!
Is this the correct verb: Had got? or had gotten? :?:
Thank you. |
|
Lizzette I'm new here and I like it ;-)

Joined: 10 Mar 2008 Posts: 11 Location: Miami
|
 |
#11 (permalink) Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:09 am Explanation of the Conditional III |
|
|
. Both are fine. . _________________ Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's |
|
Mister Micawber Language Coach
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 13018
|
 |
#12 (permalink) Sat May 09, 2009 4:35 am Had got/gotten |
|
|
It's not really a question of right or wrong. Both forms of the past participle are used. Gotten is used in North America.
Alan[/quote]
If that is so, why don't you use the american form. There are many difficulties in the tests, and we spend time thinking if that's right or wrong Thanks a lot. _________________ A cup of good coffe can make life bearable. |
|
Alfwm I'm here quite often ;-)

Joined: 28 Dec 2008 Posts: 134 Location: Bogotá, Colombia
|
 |
#13 (permalink) Tue Jun 30, 2009 20:10 pm Explanation of the Conditional III |
|
|
hii , I just thought about like a future action when i saw "would you have been" in the second part of the sentence. thus i wrote like, "If you will have got that job, would you have been able to move to a new house?" please correct me why is it wrong?
Amal. |
|
Amalmusica You can meet me at english-test.net

Joined: 19 Mar 2009 Posts: 72 Location: India
|
 |
#14 (permalink) Tue Jun 30, 2009 23:46 pm Explanation of the Conditional III |
|
|
Alfwm: Either form is correct, and that is something you have just learned, so there is no need for you to think about that any more.
Amal: The tenses of your sentence do not make sense, particularly because we do not normally use 'will' in if-clauses, so; nevertheless, a past action cannot depend on a future action, in life or in grammar. _________________ Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's |
|
Mister Micawber Language Coach
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 13018
|
 |
#15 (permalink) Sat Dec 05, 2009 14:40 pm Explanation of the Conditional III |
|
|
Hi Mr. Torsten what is the difference b/w HADE/HAVE? |
|
Fayez I'm new here and I like it ;-)
Joined: 13 Apr 2009 Posts: 30
|
 |
|
If you're not ready in five minutes, you're on your own... | Expression on your face... |