Difference between can and be able to

[Saifon]

Test No. incompl/elem-7 "Modals", question 9

When will you ......... come and see us in our new house?

(a) can
(b) be able to
(c) must

Test No. incompl/elem-7 "Modals", answer 9

When will you be able to come and see us in our new house?

Correct answer: (b) be able to

Your answer was: incorrect
When will you can come and see us in our new house?
_________________________

Could you please identify the different between 'can' and ' be able to '? Since I was ensured that I could use ' can' in this sentence, I become surprised to find that my answer is wrong.
Thank you in advance.
Saifon

[Alan]

The auxiliary can is a so called defective verb because there is no infinitive form and no past participle. This means that you have to use other words to replace these missing parts. You use the infinitive after will and so you use the alternative form be able, which acts as the substitute.
_________________
English as a Second Language
You can read my ESL story Present Simple

[Daltomaciel]

That's ok.
But, in this case:
After the accident he was no longer able to walk.
Could I use "can" or "could" in the case?
How would it be?

[Skrej]

'After the accident he was no longer able to walk.'
'After the accident, he could no longer walk.'

Both are acceptable, yes. However, you might also hear the 2nd version as:
'After the accident, he couldn't walk.' or 'After the accident, he couldn't walk anymore.'
_________________
Plan to be spontaneous tomorrow.
***
Did you hear they arrested the Energizer Bunny on battery charges?
***

[Lost_Soul]

In my opinion, the difference kicks in, when you need to use "can" in the past tense and in affirmative sentences, as in:
1. He was able to climb the mountain on that date
2. In his youth, he could climb mountains

[Sumade]

I'm sorry - but I have a question according to "can".

"Can" is also called a defective verb because it has no infinitive and no past participle. Can you please tell me what "could" is? I thought it is the past form of "can".

So this is wrong: I could buy that book.
And this is right: I was able to buy that book.

??

And another question: infinitive - is this the same as the base form of a verb? In school we learned verbs by saying "to live, to go..." Maybe the infinitive form is "to live" and the base form is "live"

thanks and
best regards

[Sumade]

Another question. I have problems with terms - so what is the difference between auxiliar verbs and modal verbs? :?

Sincerely,
Sumade

[Alan]

Hi,

'Could' is a past from of 'can' as in: When I was younger, I could run longer distances - where it means: I was physically able to run longer distances. Another meaning of 'could' is 'would be able to' as in: I could buy that book if I had more money.

Alan
_________________
English as a Foreign Language
You can read my EFL story Progressive Forms

[Kevinqi]

Dear Alan,

For this question,can I explain like as follows:

"can" is a verb which is used only in present tense and past tense(could) whereas "be able to" can use in all tenses.

I'm hoping for a yes.:)

[Alan]

Hi,

Yes, and just to repeat: 'can' is for present situations and 'could' is for either 'was able to' or 'would be able to'. 'Be able to' is possible in all the tenses that you can make with the verb 'be'.

Alan
_________________
English as a Second Language
You can read my ESL story Passive Voice

[Mitra584]

Dear Alan, one of my friend in forum explained in this :

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

'After the accident he was no longer able to walk.'
'After the accident, he could no longer walk.'

Both are acceptable, yes. However, you might also hear the 2nd version as:
'After the accident, he couldn't walk.' or 'after the accident, he couldn't walk anymore.'
Is there any difference between two sentences by definition?
With the best regard
Mitra584
Peace&Love
_________________
Peace&Love

[Niaz1]

it's still strange for me can you explain it more clearer for me please?

[Samual]

There is a easy explanation of can it means it must be complete the task by him or her.Can be a so-called auxiliary verb defect, because there is no infinitive form, and no past participle. This means that you have to use other words to replace these missing parts. You can use, the infinitive, so you can use another form, substitute.In my opinion, the difference between playing, when you need to use the past tense and affirmative sentences "can."